The Parameters for a Character’s Existence

In Terry Eagleton’s How to Read Literature, he examines the existence of fictional characters. First looking at an excerpt from Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Eagleton examines the characters of Theatre:

“be cheerful, sir.

Our revels now are ended. These our actors,

As I foretold you, were all spirits, and

Are melted into air, into thin air;

And, like the baseless fabric of this vision,

The cloud-capp’d towers, the gorgeous palaces,

The solemn temples, the great globe itself,

Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,

 And, like the insubstantial pageant faded,

Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff

As dreams are made on; and our little life

Is rounded with a sleep…”


The theatre can teach us some truth, but it is the truth of the illusory nature of our existence. It can alert us to the dream-like quality of our lives, their brevity, mutability and lack of solid grounds. As such, by reminding us of our mortality, it can foster in us the virtue of humility. This is a precious accomplishment, since much of our moral trouble springs from the unconscious assumption that we will live forever. In fact, our lives will meet with as categorical a conclusion as the end of The Tempest. This, however, may not be as dismaying as it sounds. If we were to accept that our existence is as fragile and fugitive as that of Prospero and Miranda, we might reap some advantage from doing so. We might cling to life in a less white-knuckled way, and so enjoy ourselves more and injure others less. Perhaps this is why Prospero, rather strangely in the context, urges us to be cheerful. The transience of things is not wholly to be regretted. If love and bottles of Châteauneuf-du-Pape pass away, so do wars and tyrants.

Here, Eagleton speaks on the characters of a play, and by extension the characters of novels, short stories, poems, and all other forms of fiction, and their illusory and fading existence. They are only real in the plot of the work. They have no true pasts or futures outside of the literary work.

Eagleton takes this to draw on an important point about our existence. That we, ultimately, are just as illusory and fading. While this thought can be depressing, it can also better our lives and our state of mind.


2 thoughts on “The Parameters for a Character’s Existence

  1. Joey: I’m so glad that you’re reading Eagleton. He’s terrific, even if I’m occasionally in disagreement, as here. Yes, our lives occasionally have a “dream-like quality”; they are marked by “brevity” and “mutability,” even “lack of solid grounds” when we try to build our house on a foundation of sand instead of rock. But is it true to say that the nature of our existence is illusory? No. My life is really real, even if it feels or seems unreal at times because it belongs to God.


  2. Of course, I meant to just evoke the message he delivers. I agree that our lives can and should be invested in God. The clearest image of the illusory effects of our lives mixed with the foundation we find in God can be found in Ecclesiastes.

    But I do agree with you that our lives, if rooted in Truth, are not fading.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s